←back to thread

713 points greenburger | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
b0a04gl ◴[] No.44296183[source]
everyone saw this coming the day facebook bought it, but the real issue isn't ads in status . it's that the platform is now locked into meta's attention monetization engine. the founders explicitly said no ads. now not only ads, but paid channels, algorithmic exposure, and user segmentation creeping in. most people won't switch because of network effects, so meta can keep tightening the screws. this isn't about revenue, it's about control. they’re reshaping a private messaging tool into a broadcast platform with tracking hooks. and most users won’t even notice until it’s too embedded to undo
replies(5): >>44296420 #>>44296685 #>>44296698 #>>44296875 #>>44297519 #
fouronnes3 ◴[] No.44296420[source]
It is becoming painfully apparent that the cycle of enshittification is truly inevitable, right up there next to the second law of thermodynamics.
replies(3): >>44296456 #>>44297644 #>>44299307 #
bapak[dead post] ◴[] No.44296456[source]
[flagged]
rhubarbtree ◴[] No.44296526{3}[source]
Seem to remember paying for WhatsApp when I first downloaded it. I’d be happy to keep paying. Just not the amount that they can make from advertising. Solution maybe to ban intrusive advertising so they can’t make a lot of money from it that way?
replies(1): >>44298182 #
1. upcoming-sesame ◴[] No.44298182{4}[source]
I would be happy to pay few bucks a month for an instant messaging service to make sure it's independent. I consider it basic necessity like internet on my phone.

The problem is the fragmentation. We need federation first across all providers and then everyone could choose whatever provider they want to pay for