←back to thread

713 points greenburger | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.58s | source
Show context
b0a04gl ◴[] No.44296183[source]
everyone saw this coming the day facebook bought it, but the real issue isn't ads in status . it's that the platform is now locked into meta's attention monetization engine. the founders explicitly said no ads. now not only ads, but paid channels, algorithmic exposure, and user segmentation creeping in. most people won't switch because of network effects, so meta can keep tightening the screws. this isn't about revenue, it's about control. they’re reshaping a private messaging tool into a broadcast platform with tracking hooks. and most users won’t even notice until it’s too embedded to undo
replies(5): >>44296420 #>>44296685 #>>44296698 #>>44296875 #>>44297519 #
fouronnes3 ◴[] No.44296420[source]
It is becoming painfully apparent that the cycle of enshittification is truly inevitable, right up there next to the second law of thermodynamics.
replies(3): >>44296456 #>>44297644 #>>44299307 #
bapak[dead post] ◴[] No.44296456[source]
[flagged]
osculum ◴[] No.44296512[source]
WhatsApp used to be a paid app, and I paid for it back in the day, as did lots of my friends.
replies(2): >>44296684 #>>44296733 #
bapak ◴[] No.44296733[source]
You can't have both a paid app and an app with billions of users.

You can use WhatsApp to talk to people across the world, you bet your ass that nobody would be using it in Indonesia and Brazil if it costed one dollar, vastly diminishing its value.

If you want a free app that only part of users worldwide can afford there's already iMessage.

replies(3): >>44296924 #>>44297109 #>>44297536 #
homebrewer ◴[] No.44297109[source]
Nonsense, it was very popular in my low-income country even back then. They charged something like half a day of income of a manual laborer per year, and everybody was happy to pay since it made your life so much easier. Of course, there's no going back now that everybody is accustomed to using it "for free".
replies(1): >>44297426 #
1. bapak ◴[] No.44297426[source]
If you read other top-level comments, you'll find that many people are simply allergic to paying for software. A lot of people don't have cards or even bank accounts so it's just not possible.
replies(1): >>44297561 #
2. bonoboTP ◴[] No.44297561[source]
It replaced SMS, which was costly, so the deal was pretty clear. Back in those days people were quite aware of SMS prices and 1 EUR/year to replace SMS was a no brainer. It was very popular despite the price. For many people, it was the only app they actually bought.