←back to thread

399 points nomdep | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
bdamm ◴[] No.44295003[source]
No offense intended, but this is written by a guy who has the spare time to write the blog. I can only assume his problem space is pretty narrow. I'm not sure what his workflow is like, but personally I am interacting with so many different tools, in so many different environments, with so many unique problem sets, that being able to use AIs for error evaluation, and yes, for writing code, has indeed been a game changer. In my experience it doesn't replace people at all, but they sure are powerful tools. Can they write unsupervised code? No. Do you need to read the code they write? Yes, absolutely. Can the AIs produce bugs that take time to find? Yes.

But despite all that, the tools can find problems, get information, and propose solutions so much faster and across such a vast set of challenges that I simply cannot imagine going back to working without them.

This fellow should keep on working without AIs. All the more power to him. And he can ride that horse all the way into retirement, most likely. But it's like ignoring the rise of IDEs, or Google search, or AWS.

replies(2): >>44295035 #>>44295098 #
1. ken47 ◴[] No.44295035[source]
> rise of IDEs, or Google search, or AWS.

None of these things introduced the risk of directly breaking your codebase without very close oversight. If LLMs can surpass that hurdle, then we’ll all be having a different conversation.

replies(3): >>44295051 #>>44295346 #>>44296052 #
2. bdamm ◴[] No.44295051[source]
This is not the right way to look at it. You don't have to have the LLMs directly coding your work unsupervised to see the enormous power that is there.

And besides, not all LLMs are the same when it comes to breaking existing functions. I've noticed that Claude 3.7 is far better at not breaking things that already work than whatever it is that comes with Cursor by default, for example.

3. stray ◴[] No.44295346[source]
A human deftly wielding an LLM can surpass that hurdle. I laugh at the idea of telling Claude Code to do the needful and then blindly pushing to prod.
4. wiseowise ◴[] No.44296052[source]
Literally everything in this list, except AWS, introduces risk of breaking your code base without close oversight. Same people who copy paste LLM code into IDEs are yesterday’s copy paste from SO and random Google searches.