←back to thread

579 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
wao0uuno ◴[] No.44288283[source]
I tested meshtastic in a major european city with pretty much 100% mesh coverage and its real life performance was quite underwhelming. Often I would receive messages that I could not reply to because of differences in antenna gain and crappy mesh performance. Public chat was either completely dead or flooded with test messages. Everything was super slow because the mesh can’t actually scale that well and craps out with more than a 100 nodes. Even medium fast channel would clog up fast. I would never depend on meshtastic during an emergency because it barely works even when nobody is using it. I think a public wifi mesh would be more worthwhile. Older used wifi routers are pretty much free and in unlimited supply. They use very little power. Everyone already has a compatible client device on their pocket. Sure the mesh would fail during a total blackout but at least it would be useful for something when the power is up.
replies(8): >>44288360 #>>44288526 #>>44288738 #>>44289031 #>>44289394 #>>44289536 #>>44289709 #>>44293576 #
UltraSane ◴[] No.44289536[source]
Meshtatisc's routing is extremely primitive and inefficient.

https://www.disk91.com/2024/technology/lora/critical-analysi...

replies(1): >>44294462 #
1. nullc ◴[] No.44294462[source]
I've also found meshtastic to be pretty ineffectual, in both urban enviroments and in totally rural ones where my devices are the only devices for >50 miles.

I've given more study to the latter, and I think it's the lack of store and forward reliable transmission. The messages goes out once and if it doesn't make it.. too bad so sad. The whole ecosystem strongly assuming you have internet access is also a real bummer.

If anyone is looking to improve it or develop a better alternative, I did help create a primitive you should consider using: https://github.com/sipa/minisketch