←back to thread

849 points dvektor | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
mlissner ◴[] No.44289885[source]
Maine's remote work program is an incredibly promising development to prevent recidivism. The amazing thing about it is that it gives real jobs to prisoners that they can seamlessly continue after they get out of prison. Normally when you get out, it's impossible to get a job, and the clock is ticking. This leads to desperation, which leads to bad behavior.

There is a real risk of exploitation, but if it's properly managed, remote work for prisoners is one of the most hopeful things I've heard about the prison system. It gives people purpose while there and an avenue to success once they're out.

replies(7): >>44290046 #>>44290150 #>>44291513 #>>44291690 #>>44293165 #>>44293193 #>>44293353 #
antihero ◴[] No.44291513[source]
It's amazing. Absolutely insane that people are incarcerated so long for non-violent drug crimes, though.

Turso also looks really neat for small Payload sites.

replies(6): >>44291553 #>>44291566 #>>44292193 #>>44292237 #>>44292324 #>>44292442 #
badc0ffee ◴[] No.44292193[source]
"Non-violent drug crimes" brings to mind hippies selling weed or mushrooms. But this guy was selling carfentanil. I'm not saying he's to blame for the opioid crisis turning street people into shambling zombies, clogging emergency services with overdoses, and causing death, but he certainly played a part.
replies(3): >>44292326 #>>44292609 #>>44292879 #
cortesoft ◴[] No.44292326[source]
He played a lot smaller part than the Sackler family, who ran Purdue Pharma and pushed their drugs into communities. They killed a lot more people than this guy, and yet none of them are in jail.
replies(5): >>44292476 #>>44292531 #>>44292717 #>>44293364 #>>44294264 #
tux3 ◴[] No.44292476[source]
The Sacklers are comfortably above the law and that's a bad thing, but that doesn't make small time carfentanyl operations any less bad

Evil is a threshold, it's not a competition with limited spots

Sometimes big crime families or notorious serial killers get away with it, but it doesn't lower the threshold for anyone else

It doesn't make it any better that someone else is doing even worse. You don't get to do a little crime, as a treat

replies(4): >>44292817 #>>44292956 #>>44293605 #>>44294089 #
cess11 ◴[] No.44292817[source]
"You don't get to do a little crime, as a treat"

Why not? I much prefer a society in which I can get away with some crimes to one where every crime is prosecuted.

replies(1): >>44293790 #
rangestransform ◴[] No.44293790[source]
Discretionary enforcement is just used as a way to disguise discrimination

Perhaps our laws would be fairer and simpler if enforcement were draconian and uniform

replies(4): >>44293962 #>>44294020 #>>44295150 #>>44296367 #
1. theoreticalmal ◴[] No.44293962[source]
Very interesting spectrum you’re suggesting