←back to thread

WhatsApp introduces ads in its app

(www.nytimes.com)
713 points greenburger | 6 comments | 16 Jun 25 13:38 UTC | HN request time: 1.368s | source | bottom
Show context
vips7L ◴[16 Jun 25 14:58 UTC] No.44290234[source]▶
Just another reason iMessage is coming out on top.
replies(2): >>44293902 #>>44294010 #
1. tacker2000 ◴[16 Jun 25 22:18 UTC] No.44293902[source]▶
imessage is irrelevant outside of the US.
replies(1): >>44294399 #
2. vips7L ◴[16 Jun 25 23:50 UTC] No.44294399[source]▶
That literally means nothing when it comes to determining which is the better platform.
replies(1): >>44296466 #
3. tacker2000 ◴[17 Jun 25 07:14 UTC] No.44296466[source]▶
Imessage is a platform also owned by big tech, and the primary motivation and goal of Apple is to keep users locked in to their own ecosystem.

As a a result, imessage doesnt support any other mobile platforms properly, and even discriminates against users that dont have an iphone. The world outside of the US doesnt have 80% iphone penetration.

How you can say that imessage is any “better” is a complete mystery to me.

Both apps (whatsapp and imessage) are just here to serve their big tech overlords in their own bigger picture.

replies(1): >>44296799 #
4. vips7L ◴[17 Jun 25 08:16 UTC] No.44296799{3}[source]▶
> How you can say that imessage is any “better” is a complete mystery to me.

We’re literally in a thread about being served ads in WhatsApp.

replies(1): >>44297092 #
5. tacker2000 ◴[17 Jun 25 09:05 UTC] No.44297092{4}[source]▶
They are both not a good solution to good, secure, ubiquitious and “free” messaging.
replies(1): >>44297547 #
6. vips7L ◴[17 Jun 25 10:34 UTC] No.44297547{5}[source]▶
Yes let’s keep moving the goal post.