←back to thread

849 points dvektor | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.882s | source
Show context
ArthurStacks[dead post] ◴[] No.44291367[source]
[flagged]
bastawhiz ◴[] No.44291709[source]
Sorry, but this is a disgusting take. Addiction is well established as an illness. It's outright shameful to suggest that someone who is going through recovery is purely doing it as a grift. What you're suggesting is that we can't trust that rehabilitation is possible or reasonable, which is a deeply cruel prospect.
replies(2): >>44291761 #>>44291881 #
croemer ◴[] No.44291881[source]
Rehabilitation is great. But you might have the wrong idea about the crime.

It wasn't just addiction. He had enough U-47700 for 30,000 trips (30 thousand). See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44291172

replies(1): >>44293851 #
1. bastawhiz ◴[] No.44293851[source]
I'm not disputing that. But someone doesn't simply decide to acquire that much of a very serious drug with a sound mind. Is it fair to treat a crime the same for two people if one person is suffering from schizophrenia and the other is of sound mind?

Simply saying "you did a terrible thing, and that's irredeemable" isn't useful to society. What good are you doing if you've rehabilitated the criminal? You're just spending tax dollars on principle. It's cruel and unproductive.

replies(1): >>44294901 #
2. ArthurStacks ◴[] No.44294901[source]
Great, go take that idea to the parents who want justice for the child who is dead due to scumbags like this guy.
replies(1): >>44305819 #
3. bastawhiz ◴[] No.44305819[source]
It doesn't matter what the parents think. Truly. Prison isn't and has never been about making the family of victims whole. And this guy didn't kill anyone.
replies(1): >>44306428 #