←back to thread

849 points dvektor | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.352s | source
Show context
mlissner ◴[] No.44289885[source]
Maine's remote work program is an incredibly promising development to prevent recidivism. The amazing thing about it is that it gives real jobs to prisoners that they can seamlessly continue after they get out of prison. Normally when you get out, it's impossible to get a job, and the clock is ticking. This leads to desperation, which leads to bad behavior.

There is a real risk of exploitation, but if it's properly managed, remote work for prisoners is one of the most hopeful things I've heard about the prison system. It gives people purpose while there and an avenue to success once they're out.

replies(7): >>44290046 #>>44290150 #>>44291513 #>>44291690 #>>44293165 #>>44293193 #>>44293353 #
dfxm12 ◴[] No.44290150[source]
Do participants get paid a real wage?
replies(1): >>44290225 #
glommer ◴[] No.44290225[source]
Preston was free to negotiate his pay with us, and we pay him a full salary. Just no health care benefits.
replies(2): >>44290487 #>>44290988 #
dgacmu ◴[] No.44290487[source]
Does he actually get the salary, or does the prison take huge overhead?
replies(2): >>44290547 #>>44290868 #
glommer ◴[] No.44290547[source]
they take an (actually very reasonable) cut, but he is free to take his salary.
replies(2): >>44290606 #>>44292364 #
kgwxd ◴[] No.44290606[source]
No cut is reasonable.
replies(6): >>44290689 #>>44290761 #>>44290790 #>>44290903 #>>44291361 #>>44291420 #
conductr ◴[] No.44291420[source]
I disagree. The cut should support the program itself and then further offset taxpayer expenses related to housing, feeding, and caring for the prisoner. I could even see a case for taking it as a way of ensuring it was saved and returned at release.
replies(1): >>44292111 #
franga2000 ◴[] No.44292111[source]
Fuck no! Lowering the cost of keeping people in prison would make it even easier for the government to lock people up for smaller crimes and with bigger sentences. It's even worse with the privatised prison system that the US has. They already know the "market price" (what the government is willing to spend) so adding "free money" into the equation just makes it easier for them to raise prices and end up pocketing even more money than they already do.

Framing it as offsetting the cost would also make it very easy to increase the cut, bit by bit, until it gets to a truly unreasonable level. And since the person is already in prison and we have to pay for them no matter what, why would they choose to work if the deal is so bad?

replies(3): >>44292571 #>>44292766 #>>44293241 #
1. ◴[] No.44292571[source]