←back to thread

579 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
wao0uuno ◴[] No.44288283[source]
I tested meshtastic in a major european city with pretty much 100% mesh coverage and its real life performance was quite underwhelming. Often I would receive messages that I could not reply to because of differences in antenna gain and crappy mesh performance. Public chat was either completely dead or flooded with test messages. Everything was super slow because the mesh can’t actually scale that well and craps out with more than a 100 nodes. Even medium fast channel would clog up fast. I would never depend on meshtastic during an emergency because it barely works even when nobody is using it. I think a public wifi mesh would be more worthwhile. Older used wifi routers are pretty much free and in unlimited supply. They use very little power. Everyone already has a compatible client device on their pocket. Sure the mesh would fail during a total blackout but at least it would be useful for something when the power is up.
replies(8): >>44288360 #>>44288526 #>>44288738 #>>44289031 #>>44289394 #>>44289536 #>>44289709 #>>44293576 #
cedws ◴[] No.44288526[source]
I'm surprised that phone manufacturers haven't already implemented a mesh network. I guess you could kind of call Apple's Find My network one, but if you want to smuggle arbitary data the bandwidth is very low. Maybe Apple's new mobile Wi-Fi chip is a precursor to an actual Internet mesh network.
replies(5): >>44289071 #>>44291456 #>>44292519 #>>44297805 #>>44301375 #
1. PokemonNoGo ◴[] No.44292519[source]
I don't think they themselves need to implement it. During the Hong Kong protests in 2019 they used apps like Bridgefy.