←back to thread

849 points dvektor | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.709s | source
Show context
mlissner ◴[] No.44289885[source]
Maine's remote work program is an incredibly promising development to prevent recidivism. The amazing thing about it is that it gives real jobs to prisoners that they can seamlessly continue after they get out of prison. Normally when you get out, it's impossible to get a job, and the clock is ticking. This leads to desperation, which leads to bad behavior.

There is a real risk of exploitation, but if it's properly managed, remote work for prisoners is one of the most hopeful things I've heard about the prison system. It gives people purpose while there and an avenue to success once they're out.

replies(7): >>44290046 #>>44290150 #>>44291513 #>>44291690 #>>44293165 #>>44293193 #>>44293353 #
dfxm12 ◴[] No.44290150[source]
Do participants get paid a real wage?
replies(1): >>44290225 #
glommer ◴[] No.44290225[source]
Preston was free to negotiate his pay with us, and we pay him a full salary. Just no health care benefits.
replies(2): >>44290487 #>>44290988 #
dgacmu ◴[] No.44290487[source]
Does he actually get the salary, or does the prison take huge overhead?
replies(2): >>44290547 #>>44290868 #
glommer ◴[] No.44290547[source]
they take an (actually very reasonable) cut, but he is free to take his salary.
replies(2): >>44290606 #>>44292364 #
kgwxd ◴[] No.44290606[source]
No cut is reasonable.
replies(6): >>44290689 #>>44290761 #>>44290790 #>>44290903 #>>44291361 #>>44291420 #
bryanrasmussen ◴[] No.44290903[source]
"No cut" is reasonable, but also "Some cut" is reasonable. However while arguing that "no cut" should be mandatory is reasonable, given that "no cut" would itself be reasonable, it is probably not pragmatic. Therefore in order to best support this kind of thing one should determine exactly how much "some cut" should be.
replies(1): >>44291652 #
osigurdson ◴[] No.44291652[source]
Isn't this largely just a one off situation that happened to work out? I doubt there will be legions of prisoners working remotely. If that future did come to be, it would be rather dystopian imo.
replies(2): >>44291739 #>>44292210 #
1. psunavy03 ◴[] No.44292210[source]
More dystopian than people in prison not being able to prepare themselves for a life outside?
replies(1): >>44298036 #
2. osigurdson ◴[] No.44298036[source]
The moral hazard is rather high. At the limit, the entire white-collar work force is wrongfully imprisoned, working for slave wages.
replies(1): >>44300186 #
3. psunavy03 ◴[] No.44300186[source]
. . . ok.

Perhaps it'd be an interesting SFF novel.