←back to thread

713 points greenburger | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
andrepd ◴[] No.44289568[source]
Would be nice if these kinds of articles would at least take a paragraph to plug some alternatives, such as Signal.
replies(6): >>44289598 #>>44289607 #>>44289679 #>>44289691 #>>44293594 #>>44295428 #
jahnu ◴[] No.44289679[source]
Signal have a few things that make it a hard sell.

It's really hard to clean up media. You have to go into every single chat and from there go about deleting stuff. At least they finally added a "select all" option in there recently.

So the size of it just grows and grows and grows until it's using all the space on your phone. Not a good fit for non-technical types.

Secondly, no web view. There is the desktop app yes, which is flaky, slow and wants to update every day or two.

I just can't see average people putting up with those inconveniences and that's just a couple of them.

replies(4): >>44289708 #>>44289786 #>>44290319 #>>44296788 #
andrepd ◴[] No.44290319[source]
It's very frustrating, I admit. Backups and archival are indeed a pet peeve of mine, as are the frequent redesigns (but that's just a "feature" virtually every single god-damn modern app).

What is the alternative though? A private chat app, mobile + desktop, syncing, with enough ease of setup and use for normies to adopt? I don't see it.

replies(2): >>44291109 #>>44294821 #
1. jahnu ◴[] No.44291109{3}[source]
I suppose the true alternative would be a standard open protocol that enables this cross platform.