←back to thread

849 points dvektor | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.483s | source
Show context
bjorkandkd[dead post] ◴[] No.44289491[source]
[flagged]
eddieroger ◴[] No.44289564[source]
From your link:

> The defendant, Preston Thorpe, appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled drug with intent to sell

He may have done other things, but his conviction was for possession with intent, and that seems to be why he's locked up. It doesn't make anything else he's done acceptable, but in America he's innocent until proven guilty, and it doesn't seem he was found guilty of assault.

replies(7): >>44289660 #>>44289668 #>>44289818 #>>44289828 #>>44289842 #>>44289845 #>>44290017 #
namenotrequired ◴[] No.44289842[source]
He’s not just saying he was locked up due to drugs. He’s saying that “all” his “poor decisions and lifestyle choices” in his twenties were related to drugs.
replies(1): >>44290168 #
mkoubaa ◴[] No.44290168[source]
It's not that wild to notice the connection between drug use and domestic abuse.
replies(1): >>44290499 #
1. onion2k ◴[] No.44290499[source]
In a generalized sense, sure. There's both a strong correlation and a proven causation that drugs and domestic abuse go hand in hand across the prison population.

However, on any individual case the same is not true, because that moves from talking about averages and general cases into specifics, and the burden of proof changes significantly. While there is a connection on average, that isn't enough to say any specific drug abuser commits domestic abuse. For that, ideally, you need criminal charges proven in court. That's missing here.

replies(1): >>44292831 #
2. mkoubaa ◴[] No.44292831[source]
Right, but the individual in question could rightly find the causal change in their own behavior.