←back to thread

579 points todsacerdoti | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.411s | source
Show context
nunobrito ◴[] No.44287588[source]
OK but kind of outdated and incomplete. Meshcore is largely competing with Meshtastic nowadays: https://meshcore.co.uk/

To remember: LoRa only permits small text messages. Don't even think about images, voice nor binary files (I mean it).

Another option is APRS using satellite connections through a cheap chinese walkie-talkie (Quangsheng UV-K5) for 20 euros to send text messages.

replies(5): >>44287701 #>>44287842 #>>44287970 #>>44289945 #>>44290702 #
ChrisMarshallNY ◴[] No.44287701[source]
Huh. Hadn’t heard of Meshcore before. Thanks for that. It sounds more organized than Meshtastic. Seems more polished, but also a bit more opaque (from my cursory examination). That may just be, because it’s not had as much time to get established. It has all the open credentials.

From her article:

> Their answer was both depressing and freeing: “You can’t. All you can do is be prepared with tools and a plan for when the crisis arrives. That’s when the organization will listen.”

That is so sad, but also, so true.

I was fortunate to have worked for a company that is over 100 years old, and that had weathered a couple of wars, depression, recession, market disruption, etc.

They were about as open to disaster planning as anyone, but they could also be head-in-the-sand knuckleheads. The biggest thing was the company had a fiscal and cultural conservative bent; quite unusual in the tech industry, these days.

Anyone that has managed a DR system, knows how difficult it is to get support. Disaster Recovery is expensive, resource-intensive, and difficult to test. It is also stuff people don’t want to think about. Sort of like insurance.

replies(2): >>44287801 #>>44287826 #
MaKey ◴[] No.44287826[source]
AFAIK Meshcore was started by a disgruntled Meshtastic developer. It has got a smaller community and is messaging only, no sensor data transfer.
replies(1): >>44287884 #
nunobrito ◴[] No.44287884[source]
Then maybe time to know more rather than just throwing such claims.

The network itself does far more than what other projects were doing and is being fast adopted across Europe.

replies(1): >>44288682 #
MaKey ◴[] No.44288682[source]
> Then maybe time to know more rather than just throwing such claims.

Then please educate me, I'm listening.

replies(1): >>44288840 #
1. nunobrito ◴[] No.44288840[source]
I'm not your teacher, nor interested in that role. On Youtube you find complete comparison videos like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T56GTiHvZuE
replies(2): >>44289354 #>>44289991 #
2. tiagod ◴[] No.44289354[source]
Isn't this video by the Meshcore developer?
3. ChrisMarshallNY ◴[] No.44289991[source]
To be fair, he actually says that he isn't able to do comparison vids, yet (because the UK is fairly flooded with Meshcore, so I guess it's a good reason).

The video is a promotion for Meshcore.

But I'm not sure that's necessarily a negative. Meshcore does seem to be a good thing.

The one issue, from my limited understanding, is that Meshocore doesn't seem to have integrated positional data, which would be very important for things like emergency response efforts.