←back to thread

579 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
adornKey[dead post] ◴[] No.44287958[source]
[flagged]
t0lo ◴[] No.44288454[source]
I tried to parse it by reading the intro and the conclusion. Is it trying to say some of the heating effects will be potentially saturated and limited when co2 increases, decreasing temperature? York and Princeton seem legit but don't know about how well received this is
replies(2): >>44288622 #>>44288633 #
1. adornKey ◴[] No.44288633[source]
The essence is that each frequency alone is eventually saturated. (can't absorb more than everything). If you add more CO2 you'll start to absorb more in new frequencies, but the effect is getting smaller. To calculate how much the numbers add up, there is HITRAN-Database with a lot of data about the absorption lines.

About these calculations there's interesting material out there. I think there's even software to download, and feed with a download of HITRAN-Data.