←back to thread

124 points akktor | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source

This question's for all those cool projects or skills you're secretly fascinated by, but haven't quite jumped into. Maybe you feel like you just don't have the right "brain" for it, or you're not smart enough to figure it out, or even worse, you simply have no clue how or where to even start.

The idea here is to shine a light on these hidden interests and the little (or big!) mental blocks that come with them. If you're already rocking in those specific areas – or you've been there and figured out how to get past similar hurdles – please chime in! Share some helpful resources, dish out general advice, or just give a nudge of encouragement on how to take that intimidating first step.

Let's help each other get unstuck!

Show context
incomingpain ◴[] No.44224446[source]
There's 2 big ones that I want to learn.

Quantum computer programming. I've dived a couple times into Qiskit from IBM. Also tried to get into dwave and ocean sdk but they never got back to me.

Qiskit tutorials are easy to blow through and i think even understand. But when trying to use it for my own purposes, just never get anywhere.

The other one for me with no success. Training my own specialized predicting AI models. Tensorflow, pytorch, and another.

I certainly prefer pytorch. Super simple to build models on simple stuff.

I'm trying to do something that literally nobody else has ever done. My lack of success has probably a lot more to do with that it's not perhaps actually doable.

Flipside, I might be re-approaching this now that i have the pycharm ai to help me in this progress.

>you've been there and figured out how to get past similar hurdles – please chime in! Share some helpful resources, dish out general advice, or just give a nudge of encouragement on how to take that intimidating first step.

Never be afraid to try. Always dare to fail; you only truly learn when failing. The easier you make it to fail, the quicker you learn.

replies(3): >>44240348 #>>44240437 #>>44240652 #
pajamasam ◴[] No.44240652[source]
Totally fair re: quantum computer programming. It's still an open question what exactly it can be useful for.

Are you trying it for anything in particular?

(I'm only getting started in it now in my Master's programme)

replies(1): >>44246198 #
incomingpain ◴[] No.44246198[source]
>Are you trying it for anything in particular?

cracking crypto. forcing netadmins and sysadmins to update crypto to quantum resistant crypto. Might as well make it a real threat :)

replies(1): >>44250030 #
1. msgodel ◴[] No.44250030[source]
I'll bet a lot of money PQC becomes commonplace before quantum breaks anything meaningful. (although I'm one of the people paid to work on PQC so maybe I'm biased.)