←back to thread

93 points nabla9 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.221s | source
Show context
melling ◴[] No.44088874[source]
$2 trillion for that war. Next time let’s cure cancer(s).

Correct, no one said it would be easy. True we would likely not have succeeded, but millions more would be cancer survivors.

replies(6): >>44088989 #>>44089127 #>>44089182 #>>44089184 #>>44094439 #>>44095588 #
motorest ◴[] No.44088989[source]
> $2 trillion for that war. Next time let’s cure cancer(s).

Aren't there any positive tradeoffs in overthrowing the likes of Saddam Hussein?

replies(8): >>44089023 #>>44089046 #>>44089083 #>>44089101 #>>44089188 #>>44089238 #>>44089291 #>>44089319 #
1. the_gipsy ◴[] No.44089291[source]
Not much. Except for the oil companies. In any case the goal was not to make the world a better place.