←back to thread

526 points cactusplant7374 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
owenversteeg ◴[] No.44077762[source]
Like other people here, I have my quibbles with the exact math. But the general premise is true: yes, you can live in rural poverty for cheap. The problem is the vibes. A hundred years ago, you would have a community, a place in society, and all of your family and friends nearby. In 2025, the only actual local job the author of the piece can come up with is at a gas station.

Top ten occupations, 1920: Farmers, farm laborers, clerks, salespeople, servants (bellboys, butlers, cooks), textile workers, machinists, carpenters, and teachers. All of those jobs, even the less respected ones, had infinitely more societal respect than the common jobs hiring in rural America today - such as stocking shelves at Walmart or working at a gas station. You could be a simple farm laborer and have a wife and kids and a place in society. Today, though, a young man working at a Walmart or a gas station will struggle to attract a stable partner or the respect of the world around him.

replies(5): >>44078785 #>>44079781 #>>44080027 #>>44080066 #>>44081183 #
kingstoned ◴[] No.44079781[source]

  "Today, though, a young man working at a Walmart or a gas station will struggle to attract a stable partner or the respect of the world around him."
True if they are not good looking. If a guy is really handsome, he could attract a partner easily and people will like him due to halo effect.
replies(1): >>44085376 #
1. sarchertech ◴[] No.44085376[source]
It’s very easy for someone hard working to move up a few ranks at Walmart. Spend a little of that extra money on clothes, and a $29k house. Then a little of your spare time on grooming, and maybe a little working out, and you won’t struggle attract a stable partner.