←back to thread

204 points pabs3 | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.422s | source
1. sanity ◴[] No.44085081[source]
A few months back I built a cryptographic alternative to CAPTCHAs called Ghost Keys[1] that uses a small donation as proof-of-humanity. For donating you get an anonymous keypair that works across services without repeated CAPTCHAs. The economic friction doesn't scale for bot operators, and donations fund our non-profit[2].

[1] https://freenet.org/ghostkey/

[2] https://freenet.org/

replies(2): >>44085273 #>>44091433 #
2. DoctorOW ◴[] No.44085273[source]
> The economic friction doesn't scale for bot operators

Does the number of keys need to scale? If $1 buys a key for life, and signing can be easily automated why would it stop bots?

replies(1): >>44085338 #
3. sanity ◴[] No.44085338[source]
Keys embed approximate timestamps, so services can set age limits. The system was designed for Freenet integration where reputation can be attached to keys - repeat abuse would degrade a key's public reputation over time.
4. Retr0id ◴[] No.44091433[source]
In the event ticket situation, how does this change the economics compared to just adding $1 to the ticket price? (or whatever your minimum donation threshold is)
replies(1): >>44092842 #
5. sanity ◴[] No.44092842[source]
It would add $1 to the ticket price, the goal is more to replace CAPTCHAs (which cost essentially nothing to defeat these days), but you're right that it wouldn't be a silver bullet in the ticket scalping scenario.