←back to thread

526 points cactusplant7374 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
keiferski ◴[] No.44075483[source]
Existing on the living standards of say, 1945, or even 1960, is very possible and allows you to make less money and presumably work on what you truly care about.

But that means you don’t get the latest iPhone, cook basic foods at home and rarely eat out, repair your own appliances, and so on. The hardest part, I think, would be dealing with the social expectations of society at large. 1960 living standards were universal in 1960, but nowadays you’re fighting the entirety of Western marketing machine.

replies(8): >>44075538 #>>44075546 #>>44075623 #>>44075650 #>>44075658 #>>44075896 #>>44077691 #>>44083661 #
dmonitor ◴[] No.44075896[source]
> that means you don’t get the latest iPhone

Why do people always have to call out "the latest iPhone". Most people can't afford the latest iPhone, nor do they try. You might as well say a Lamborghini. Why can't you be honest and just say "a smartphone".

replies(1): >>44076297 #
kemotep ◴[] No.44076297[source]
Even a brand new iPhone 16 is “only” $800. Plans for unlimited internet can be had for less than $40 a month.

Using that phone for 5 years would only add like $60 to their total monthly expenses. Is that truly unattainable? Is that really what is keeping people from buying a house?

replies(4): >>44077766 #>>44081138 #>>44082213 #>>44093502 #
1. smileysteve ◴[] No.44077766{3}[source]
$60 is ~14% of the monthly budget, so yeah, I think that would make an impact.