←back to thread

526 points cactusplant7374 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Goronmon ◴[] No.44075393[source]
I enjoy the part about "Heat? Well...I'm sure something will happen allowing me to have heat. No need for concrete plans there."
replies(2): >>44075531 #>>44076554 #
diogocp ◴[] No.44075531[source]
You mean this part?

> as far as heat goes, well, one could either pay a little extra in electric for that — or they could have the Amish deliver their scrap wood from their sawmills to burn in a wood stove, very cheaply.

replies(1): >>44075577 #
Goronmon ◴[] No.44075577[source]
Those are both vague and completely different ways to handle heating.

Also, conveniently, neither appear to have an associated cost so we don't have to worry about whether the financial math works out.

replies(1): >>44075645 #
celestialcheese ◴[] No.44075645[source]
It's because when you live rural like this, wood stoves are common, and wood is free.

I live in the northwest, so I can't speak to upstate NY, but downed trees on state and federal land near roads is free to take. Every day there's people posting rounds of wood for free to take.

It's hard work, but it's good exercise and rewarding.

There's some upfront investment: $200 chainsaw, an old maul, and an old pickup truck, but those amortized over a decade is practically speaking $0 heat.

replies(5): >>44075765 #>>44075809 #>>44076759 #>>44081114 #>>44084582 #
1. hyperpape ◴[] No.44076759{3}[source]
The author makes a big deal out of not having a car, and the math gets a heck of a lot worse if you add a truck.