←back to thread

294 points imurray | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.417s | source
Show context
srean ◴[] No.44066091[source]
The problem of predicting tides was so important that it attracted many Physics and Maths heavy weights. You can well imagine how important predicting tides would have been for D-day landing.

One related fascinating historical artifact is the special purpose analogue computer designed by Lord Kelvin in the 1860s based on Fourier series, harmonic analysis. Think difference engine in it's cogs and cams glory, but special purpose.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tide-predicting_machine

Possibly one of the first examples of Machine learning, with Machine in capital 'M'. It incorporated recent tidal observations to update it's prediction.

Note that sinusoids are universal approximators for a large class of functions, an honour that is by no means restricted to deep neural nets.

George Darwin (Charles Darwin's son) was a significant contributor in the design and upgrade of the machine.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Darwin

Other recognizable names who worked on tide prediction problem were Thomas Young (of double slit experiment fame) and Sir George Airy (of Airy disk fame).

replies(4): >>44066143 #>>44066655 #>>44069709 #>>44070084 #
rhdjsjebshjffn ◴[] No.44069709[source]
> You can well imagine how important predicting tides would have been for D-day landing.

Is this intended to communicate positivity or negativity?

Predicting tides was known to the ancients; it would be lovely to explore the hubris of the modern narrative.

Edit: fundamentally, if hacker news has taught me anything, it's that "downvote = makes me feel bad and doesn't want to answer questions". The entire concept of democratic news aggregation was a lie.

replies(4): >>44070984 #>>44071082 #>>44071318 #>>44072128 #
1. krisoft ◴[] No.44071082[source]
> Is this intended to communicate positivity or negativity?

It just says it was important to predict the tides. There is no positivity or negativity to it. Your question doesn’t make sense, hence the downvotes.

> Predicting tides was known to the ancients

Good. To which ancients? With what accuracy and how far into the future? What techniques did they use? Tell us more.

> it would be lovely to explore the hubris of the modern narrative.

Explore it then! Would love to read it. It is not like there is some conspiracy holding you back.

replies(1): >>44073174 #
2. kgwgk ◴[] No.44073174[source]
>> Predicting tides was known to the ancients

> Good. To which ancients?

To the ancients of 1944 for sure.