←back to thread

1222 points phantomathkg | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
segphault ◴[] No.44064599[source]
I was a user for so long that I was on it before it even rebranded as Pocket. I finally gave up on it last year, mostly due to frustration with the terrible 2023 redesign of the mobile app. When Mozilla made the unfathomable decision to become an internet advertising company, I figured it was just a matter of time before they had to put Pocket out to pasture. A product that's designed to strip ads from content for readability doesn't align with their new direction.

I'd probably be applauding the decision to shut this down if I thought they were doing it to free up resources to increase their focus on the browser, but Mozilla seems to be institutionally committed to chasing its own demise, so I'm sure they will instead focus on AI integration and other stuff that nobody asked for.

Meanwhile, Firefox is still missing proper support for a bunch of modern web features like view transitions and CSS anchor points that are available in every other browser.

replies(20): >>44064677 #>>44065070 #>>44065265 #>>44065461 #>>44065781 #>>44065800 #>>44066084 #>>44066430 #>>44066456 #>>44066470 #>>44067023 #>>44067313 #>>44067943 #>>44067953 #>>44068655 #>>44069372 #>>44069898 #>>44070277 #>>44071607 #>>44074502 #
major505 ◴[] No.44065781[source]
Mozilla is more occupied this days paying multi milionary bonus to its executives and begging users for money they waste on useless projects.

Mozilla must die, so Firefox can live.

replies(9): >>44066019 #>>44066309 #>>44066612 #>>44066665 #>>44066751 #>>44067105 #>>44067735 #>>44069002 #>>44071243 #
doubled112 ◴[] No.44066019[source]
And Thunderbird?
replies(3): >>44066887 #>>44069316 #>>44097600 #
kbrosnan ◴[] No.44066887[source]
It is the MZLA Technologies Corporation a subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation. Firefox is developed by the Mozilla Corporation a wholly owned part of the Mozilla Foundation.
replies(1): >>44067219 #
edoceo ◴[] No.44067219[source]
How did they even get this corporation owned by a foundation situation? That just seems like some kind of tax trick.
replies(3): >>44067344 #>>44070528 #>>44074373 #
1. thayne ◴[] No.44070528[source]
It's a "we want to sell something, but non-profits aren't allowed to do that" trick. And it means the for-profit subsidiary has to pay normal taxes.

OpenAI is structured the same way, so they can sell access to their models. At least until it switches to being entirely for-profit, if that is allowed to happen.