←back to thread

The Future of Flatpak

(lwn.net)
306 points dxs | 1 comments | 22 May 25 23:51 UTC | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
forrestthewoods ◴[23 May 25 04:48 UTC] No.44069936[source]▶
Over here in Windows land I can’t fathom why you need something like Flatpak just so users can reliably launch and run a program. I mean trust me I understand that Linux is so broken it needs something like flatpak. But imagine saying you’re disappointed the Windows executable format isn’t evolving! Running an exe shouldn’t require decades of maintenance. It shouldn’t be that complicated. It doesn’t have to be.
replies(7): >>44070461 #>>44070903 #>>44071181 #>>44071284 #>>44071949 #>>44072664 #>>44123625 #
1. SomeoneOnTheWeb ◴[23 May 25 06:34 UTC] No.44070461[source]▶
Thing is, .exe on windows is broken on so many levels. You don't have sandboxing, apps don't always follow standards as to where to store their data, there's no dependency management but if you don't have the correct version of e.g. java installed your app won't work. Etc.