←back to thread

294 points imurray | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
CommenterPerson ◴[] No.44068935[source]
Six months ago, I spent a week at the shore. It happened to be full moon. We were out walking late at night while the moon was high up, and had to slog through ankle deep water on the way back. It was like clockwork roughly 12 hours apart.

Did read through stackexchange. It is indeed complicated. But the top response feels like paralysis by analysis. If we analyzed turbulent flow too much we would be unable to build rockets. Remember frictionless planes and point masses in high school? Those results are not exact either but a great way to model and understand what is going on.

Soooo .. could we make simplifying assumptions here? What if the earth was a smooth rigid sphere with a layer of water on the surface? The center of mass of Earth-Moon is at ~3/4ths of the earth's radius, from the earth's center. They are rotating about that center. The 12+ hour tides in many parts of the world start to make sense. Is there a mistake in this mental model?

replies(3): >>44069414 #>>44069519 #>>44069665 #
1. red369 ◴[] No.44069414[source]
From reading the accepted StackExchange answer, I think the answer to your last questions is that this model might still be too simplified.

In your simplified model of the Earth, you would also need to make the ocean deep enough that the water could travel fast enough to keep up with the Earth's rotation (~22 km).