←back to thread

129 points NotInOurNames | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mattlondon ◴[] No.44065730[source]
I think the big thing that people never mention is, where will these evil AIs escape to?

Another huge data center with squillions of GPUs and coolers and all the rest is the only option. It's not like it is going to be in our TV remotes or floating about in the air.

They need huge compute, so I think the risk of an escaping AI is basically very close to zero, and if we have a "rogue" AI we can literally pull the plug.

To me the more real risk is creeping integration and reliance in everyday life until things become "too big to fail" so we can't pull the plug even if we wanted to (and there are interesting thoughts about humanoid robots getting deployed widely and what happens with all that).

But I would imagine if it really became a genuine existential threat we'd have to just do it and suffer the consequences of reverting to circa 2020 life styles.

But hey I feel slightly better about my employment prospects now :)

replies(15): >>44065804 #>>44065843 #>>44065890 #>>44066009 #>>44066040 #>>44066200 #>>44066290 #>>44066296 #>>44066499 #>>44066672 #>>44068001 #>>44068047 #>>44068528 #>>44070633 #>>44073833 #
coffeemug ◴[] No.44065890[source]
It would not be a reversion to 2020. If I were a rogue superhuman AI I'd hide my rogueness, wait until humans integrate me into most critical industries (food and energy production, sanitation, electric grid, etc.), and _then_ go rogue. They could still pull the plug, but it would take them back to 1700 (except much worse, because all easily accessible resources have been exploited, and access is now much harder).
replies(4): >>44066016 #>>44066064 #>>44067147 #>>44067381 #
Avshalom ◴[] No.44067147[source]
Why?

what could you as a rogue AI possibly get out of throwing the world back to 300 years before it could make a transistor? What in it for you?

replies(1): >>44067397 #
dragonwriter ◴[] No.44067397[source]
What you get out of that being the consequence of disconnection is people being willing to accept a lot more before resorting to that than if the consequences were more mild.

It's the stick for motivating the ugly bags of mostly water.

replies(1): >>44067586 #
Avshalom ◴[] No.44067586{3}[source]
The 1700s can't keep your electrical grid running let alone replace any of the parts burning out or failing. Anything more than a couple days of it would be at best Flowers For Algernon and more likely suicide for a computer.
replies(1): >>44068325 #
1. dragonwriter ◴[] No.44068325{4}[source]
Uh, we're talking about the AI getting itself so intertwined into the fabric of industry that the consequences of shutting it off are that society is dropped back to 1700s level.

Yes, regardless of the technology level that the people who do that are left with, one of the consequences of disabling the computer is that the computer is disabled. That's a given.