←back to thread

1222 points phantomathkg | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
segphault ◴[] No.44064599[source]
I was a user for so long that I was on it before it even rebranded as Pocket. I finally gave up on it last year, mostly due to frustration with the terrible 2023 redesign of the mobile app. When Mozilla made the unfathomable decision to become an internet advertising company, I figured it was just a matter of time before they had to put Pocket out to pasture. A product that's designed to strip ads from content for readability doesn't align with their new direction.

I'd probably be applauding the decision to shut this down if I thought they were doing it to free up resources to increase their focus on the browser, but Mozilla seems to be institutionally committed to chasing its own demise, so I'm sure they will instead focus on AI integration and other stuff that nobody asked for.

Meanwhile, Firefox is still missing proper support for a bunch of modern web features like view transitions and CSS anchor points that are available in every other browser.

replies(20): >>44064677 #>>44065070 #>>44065265 #>>44065461 #>>44065781 #>>44065800 #>>44066084 #>>44066430 #>>44066456 #>>44066470 #>>44067023 #>>44067313 #>>44067943 #>>44067953 #>>44068655 #>>44069372 #>>44069898 #>>44070277 #>>44071607 #>>44074502 #
nine_k ◴[] No.44065800[source]
> available in every other browser

Isn't it because almost every "other browser" reuses the Chromium engine? Or is Firefox trailing even mobile Safari here?

replies(4): >>44065811 #>>44067376 #>>44067706 #>>44070713 #
mvdtnz ◴[] No.44065811[source]
How does that change the basic facts from the end users' perspective?
replies(2): >>44065833 #>>44066350 #
Lutger ◴[] No.44066350[source]
It doesn't, but the sentence referred to wasn't really aimed at them. I mean, Mozilla could ditch its engine and adopt chromium in order to really focus on advertising, and then it would also support said features from an end users perspective! Somehow I have a feeling that won't earn Mozilla praise.

For all its flaws, Mozilla is actually the ONLY other company building a browser engine. When its gone, there will basically be only one left.

replies(3): >>44066664 #>>44066677 #>>44069350 #
fuzztester ◴[] No.44066664{3}[source]
what happened to opera?

i used it a good amount earlier, when it was relatively new, but then some issues happened, which I don't remember clearly, then i stopped tracking it.

replies(3): >>44066864 #>>44067278 #>>44067442 #
1. Arrowmaster ◴[] No.44067278{4}[source]
If you want old Opera look into Vivaldi. It's run by old staff from Opera pre sale.

Current Opera is owned by a Chinese company with ties to pay day loans and other shady behaviors.