←back to thread

The "AI 2027" Scenario: How realistic is it?

(garymarcus.substack.com)
129 points NotInOurNames | 4 comments | 22 May 25 17:37 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ipython ◴[22 May 25 18:34 UTC] No.44065198[source]▶
If we have concerns about unregulated power of AI systems, not to worry - the US is set to ban regulations on “artificial intelligence systems or models” for ten years if the budget bill that just passed the house is enacted.

Attempts at submitting it as a separate submission just get flagged - so I’ll link to it here. See pages 292-294: https://www.congress.gov/119/bills/hr1/BILLS-119hr1rh.pdf

replies(8): >>44065368 #>>44065415 #>>44065494 #>>44065541 #>>44065574 #>>44065598 #>>44065632 #>>44066649 #
baggy_trough ◴[22 May 25 19:04 UTC] No.44065541[source]▶
That is not true. It bans regulation at the state and local level, not at the federal level.
replies(4): >>44065578 #>>44065581 #>>44065961 #>>44069742 #
drewser42 ◴[22 May 25 19:08 UTC] No.44065581[source]▶
So wild. The Republican party has hard-pivoted to a strong, centralized federal government and their base just came along for the ride.
replies(1): >>44066003 #
baggy_trough ◴[22 May 25 19:44 UTC] No.44066003[source]▶
The strong federal government that bans regulation?
replies(1): >>44066111 #
1. ceejayoz ◴[22 May 25 19:52 UTC] No.44066111[source]▶
They're not banning regulation, they want total control over it.
replies(1): >>44066171 #
2. baggy_trough ◴[22 May 25 19:57 UTC] No.44066171[source]▶
They in fact are banning regulation at the state and local level.
replies(1): >>44066247 #
3. ceejayoz ◴[22 May 25 20:02 UTC] No.44066247[source]▶
Yes, which is a big fat regulation on what states and local governments can do.
replies(1): >>44068031 #
4. baggy_trough ◴[22 May 25 22:54 UTC] No.44068031{3}[source]▶
Would removing their regulation to ban regulation be banning regulation or not?