←back to thread

1222 points phantomathkg | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.199s | source
Show context
_def ◴[] No.44064357[source]
> Your export file will include links (URLs) of your saved items. The export does not extract the text of saved links. Additionally, the export does not contain tags or highlights.

boo! without the tags, the links will be mostly useless for me. Every now and then I thought aboyt switching to some self-hosted solution. Should've done it sooner... and I will never trust Mozilla with any service again.

replies(12): >>44064387 #>>44064622 #>>44064633 #>>44064647 #>>44064701 #>>44064943 #>>44064978 #>>44065001 #>>44065605 #>>44065678 #>>44067559 #>>44068746 #
chimeracoder ◴[] No.44064387[source]
> and I will never trust Mozilla with any service again.

Who will you trust? Google? Apple? Microsoft? It's not like any of the other behemoths have a better track record when it comes to long-term maintenance and availability of hosted consumer products. If anything, Mozilla actually has the best track record out of them all when it comes to long-term offerings.

replies(7): >>44064419 #>>44064421 #>>44064428 #>>44064465 #>>44064522 #>>44064548 #>>44065019 #
thrdbndndn ◴[] No.44064522[source]
His point is about data portability, not service uptime.

This export feature is outright bad, worse than the industry standard by a mile. Why wouldn't it include something as basic as tags? It just forces users to write their own scripts, wasting time for everyone involved.

replies(1): >>44065822 #
1. jamienicol ◴[] No.44065822[source]
It does include tags