←back to thread

305 points todsacerdoti | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
IgorPartola ◴[] No.44061907[source]
AV1 is an amazing codec. I really hope it replaces proprietary codecs like h264 and h265. It has a similar, if not better, performance to h265 while being completely free. Currently on an Intel-based Macbook it is only supported in some browsers, however it seems that newer video cards from AMD, Nvidia, and Intel do include hardware decoders.
replies(5): >>44062089 #>>44062484 #>>44063108 #>>44063170 #>>44065078 #
adzm ◴[] No.44062484[source]
Isn't VP9 more comparable to h265? AV1 seems to be a ton better than both of them.
replies(2): >>44062626 #>>44062696 #
dagmx ◴[] No.44062626[source]
They’re all in the same ballpark of each other and have characteristics that don’t make one an outright winner.
replies(1): >>44063413 #
1. CharlesW ◴[] No.44063413[source]
AV1 is the outright winner in terms of compression efficiency (until you start comparing against VVC/H.266¹), with the advantage being even starker at high resolutions. The only current notable downside of AV1 is that client hardware support isn't yet universal.

¹ https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/13/5/953