←back to thread

Devstral

(mistral.ai)
701 points mfiguiere | 1 comments | 21 May 25 14:21 UTC | HN request time: 0.278s | source
Show context
TZubiri ◴[21 May 25 22:51 UTC] No.44057053[source]▶
I feel this is part of a larger and very old business trend.

But do we need 20 companies copying each other and doing the same thing?

Like, is that really competition? I'd say competition is when you do something slightly different, but I guess it's subjective based on your interpretation of what is a commodity and what is proprietary.

To my view, everyone is outright copying and creating commodity markets:

OpenAI: The OG, the Coke of Modern AI

Claude: The first copycat, The Pepsi of Modern AI

Mistral: Euro OpenAI

DeepSeek: Chinese OpenAI

Grok/xAI: Republican OpenAI

Google/MSFT: OpenAI clone as a SaaS or Office package.

Meta's Llama: Open Source OpenAI

etc...

replies(4): >>44057097 #>>44057200 #>>44057876 #>>44059035 #
1. waldohatesyou ◴[22 May 25 01:26 UTC] No.44057876[source]▶
I don't think they're actually the same thing, I definitely feel like Claude is much better with code than ChatGPT is so there are clearly differences in the capabilities of these models. One analogy that I find helpful here is the idea that these AIs are like animals. Just like there are animals of the same family (meaning they're genetically related to some degree) they still adapt to different niches. I see all these AI companies ultimately creating models analogous to that.

Some AIs will be good at coding (perhaps in a particular language or ecosystem), some at analyzing information and churning out a report for you, and some will be better at operating in physical spaces.