←back to thread

126 points voxadam | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
megous ◴[] No.44054142[source]
I don't think anyone should be impressed by watts. Jouls are where all the real work is.

Asside for the PR article. What's the use case for pettawatt laser pulse lasting 25 quintillionths of a second?

replies(5): >>44054221 #>>44054304 #>>44054682 #>>44054823 #>>44055480 #
1. frollogaston ◴[] No.44054682[source]
Well you probably don't want a petawatt laser lasting a second, cause it'll obliterate a lot more than what you wanted to.
replies(1): >>44056009 #
2. ta1243 ◴[] No.44056009[source]
Including of course the laser. It's about 240 kilotons of TNT, or over 10 times the power of the nagasaki or hiroshmia bombs.
replies(1): >>44056210 #
3. frollogaston ◴[] No.44056210[source]
Yeah, or even if it were some more reasonable amount of energy that doesn't self-destruct it, there are probably applications where you want to hit a small area quickly without burning things around it.