←back to thread

Google AI Ultra

(blog.google)
320 points mfiguiere | 1 comments | 20 May 25 18:20 UTC | HN request time: 0.213s | source
Show context
julianpye ◴[20 May 25 20:56 UTC] No.44045838[source]▶
Why do people keep on saying that corporations will pay these price-tags? Most corporations really keep a very tight lid on their software license costs. A $250 license will be only provided for individuals with very high justification barriers and the resulting envy effects will be a horror for HR. I think it will be rather individuals who will be paying out of their pocket and boosting their internal results. And outside of those areas in California where apples cost $5 in the supermarket I don't see many individuals capable of paying these rates.
replies(6): >>44045887 #>>44045980 #>>44045988 #>>44046833 #>>44047069 #>>44063589 #
verdverm ◴[20 May 25 21:14 UTC] No.44045988[source]▶
We just signed up to spend $60+/month for every dev to have access to Copilot because the ROI is there. If $250/month save several hours per month for a person, it makes financial sense
replies(3): >>44046043 #>>44046149 #>>44046196 #
tacker2000 ◴[20 May 25 21:34 UTC] No.44046149[source]▶
How are you measuring this? How do you know it is paying off?
replies(2): >>44046269 #>>44046844 #
1. afroboy ◴[20 May 25 21:49 UTC] No.44046269[source]▶
And why AI hype train didn't work on gaming industry? why it didn't save hundreds of hours from game devs times to get latest GTA anytime sooner?

I'm not sure it's correct that we need to measure the benefits of AI depending on the lines of codes that we wrote but on how much we ship more quality features faster.