←back to thread

Google AI Ultra

(blog.google)
320 points mfiguiere | 3 comments | 20 May 25 18:20 UTC | HN request time: 0.406s | source
Show context
charles_f ◴[20 May 25 20:08 UTC] No.44045393[source]▶
This is the kind of pricing that I expect most AI companies are gonna try to push for, and it might get even more expensive with time. When you see the delta between what's currently being burnt by OpenAI and what they bring home, the sweet point is going to be hard to find.

Whether you find that you get $250 worth out of that subscription is going to be the big question

replies(5): >>44045528 #>>44045820 #>>44045959 #>>44046010 #>>44058223 #
Wowfunhappy ◴[20 May 25 21:16 UTC] No.44046010[source]▶
> When you see the delta between what's currently being burnt by OpenAI and what they bring home, the sweet point is going to be hard to find.

Moore's law should help as well, shouldn't it? GPUs will keep getting cheaper.

Unless the models also get more GPU hungry, but 2025-level performance, at least, shouldn't get more expensive.

replies(3): >>44046119 #>>44046175 #>>44046799 #
1. dvt ◴[20 May 25 21:31 UTC] No.44046119[source]▶
> Moore's law should help as well, shouldn't it? GPUs will keep getting cheaper.

Maybe I'm misremembering, but I thought Moore's law doesn't apply to GPUs?

replies(2): >>44047179 #>>44047715 #
2. Wowfunhappy ◴[21 May 25 00:18 UTC] No.44047179[source]▶
I don't know the details, but this feels like it can't be true just from looking at how video games have progressed.
3. moorelaw282 ◴[21 May 25 02:18 UTC] No.44047715[source]▶
In modern times Moore’s law applies more to GPUs than CPUs. It’s much easier to scale GPU performance by just adding cores, while real-world CPU performance is inherently limited by single-threaded work.