←back to thread

Google AI Ultra

(blog.google)
320 points mfiguiere | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
ComplexSystems ◴[] No.44044907[source]
The problem with all of these is that SOTA models keep changing. I thought about getting OpenAI's Pro subscription, and then Gemini flew ahead and was free. If I get this then sooner or later OpenAI or Anthropic will be back on top.
replies(8): >>44045006 #>>44045119 #>>44045373 #>>44045376 #>>44045495 #>>44045844 #>>44046530 #>>44047191 #
Ancapistani ◴[] No.44045495[source]
I wonder if there's an opportunity here to abstract away these subscription costs and offer a consistent interface and experience?

For example - what if someone were to start a company around a fork of LiteLLM? https://litellm.ai/

LiteLLM, out of the box, lets you create a number of virtual API keys. Each key can be assigned to a user or a team, and can be granted access to one or more models (and their associated keys). Models are configured globally, but can have an arbitrary number of "real" and "virtual" keys.

Then you could sell access to a host of primary providers - OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Groq, Grok, etc. - through a single API endpoint and key. Users could switch between them by changing a line in a config file or choosing a model from a dropdown, depending on their interface.

Assuming you're able to build a reasonable userbase, presumably you could then contract directly with providers for wholesale API usage. Pricing would be tricky, as part of your value prop would be abstracting away marginal costs, but I strongly suspect that very few people are actually consuming the full API quotas on these $200+ plans. Those that are are likely to be working directly with the providers to reduce both cost and latency, too.

The other value you could offer is consistency. Your engineering team's core mission would be providing a consistent wrapper for all of these models - translating between OpenAI-compatible, Llama-style, and Claude-style APIs on the fly.

Is there already a company doing this? If not, do you think this is a good or bad idea?

replies(4): >>44045569 #>>44045665 #>>44045783 #>>44047070 #
wild_egg ◴[] No.44045665[source]
Isn't that https://openrouter.ai? Or do you have something different in mind?
replies(1): >>44045867 #
1. Ancapistani ◴[] No.44045867[source]
I haven't seen this, but it looks like it solves at least half of what I was thinking.

I'll investigate. Thanks!