←back to thread

Google AI Ultra

(blog.google)
320 points mfiguiere | 1 comments | 20 May 25 18:20 UTC | HN request time: 0.239s | source
Show context
johnmlussier ◴[20 May 25 19:15 UTC] No.44044875[source]▶
I’m not interested in about 75% of this offering. Really wish they had pieced this out or done a credit system for it all. I want higher coding and LLM limits, Deep Think, and would like to try agent stuff, but don’t care at all about image or video generation, Notebook limits, YouTube Premium, or more storage.

$250 is a the highest cost AI sub now. Not loving this direction.

replies(7): >>44044910 #>>44044996 #>>44045001 #>>44045007 #>>44045016 #>>44045017 #>>44045831 #
camillomiller ◴[20 May 25 19:18 UTC] No.44044910[source]▶
What other direction would you expect to be possible? Even with this rates most AI companies are still bleeding money.
replies(2): >>44044945 #>>44045012 #
1. piskov ◴[20 May 25 19:21 UTC] No.44044945[source]▶
If anyone it’s Google that would be very-very inference efficient (given their custom TPUs and what have you).

However if all this power is wasted on video generation, then even them probably will choke.

Then again, I guess your average Joe/Jane will looove to generate some 10 seconds of you daily whatsapp stuff to share.