←back to thread

461 points axelfontaine | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
apexalpha ◴[] No.44039969[source]
At least the Russian gage is broader than the European one.

Imagine the cost if it was the other way around... Nevertheless, a valiant effort by the Finnish.

I guess we eventually have to do Ukraine (and Iberia?) too, so hopefully the lessons learned can be applied there.

replies(1): >>44041049 #
IAmBroom ◴[] No.44041049[source]
Why would it matter much? Either way, a new railway has to be built (others have pointed out dual-gauge is not workable).
replies(1): >>44041170 #
1. apexalpha ◴[] No.44041170[source]
If you have to go from a smaller gauge to a bigger one you most likely have to also expand corridors, buy new land, fix bridges and tunnels etc...

While a downshift if usually much esier since a smaller gauge simply fits inside the larger one so all bridges and tunnels are wide enough by definition.

replies(1): >>44044756 #
2. crote ◴[] No.44044756[source]
That's mostly an issue with loading gauge, not track gauge. The train is usually significantly wider than the tracks, so width-wise the space should already be available.