←back to thread

511 points meetpateltech | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.231s | source
Show context
nadis ◴[] No.44008123[source]
In the preview video, I appreciated Katy Shi's comment on "I think this is a reflection of where engineering work has moved over the past where a lot of my time now is spent reviewing code rather than writing it."

Preview video from Open AI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhdpnbfH6NU&t=878s

As I think about what "AI-native" or just the future of building software loos like, its interesting to me that - right now - developers are still just reading code and tests rather than looking at simulations.

While a new(ish) concept for software development, simulations could provide a wider range of outcomes and, especially for the front end, are far easier to evaluate than just code/tests alone. I'm biased because this is something I've been exploring but it really hit me over the head looking at the Codex launch materials.

replies(5): >>44008199 #>>44010123 #>>44012135 #>>44012584 #>>44012926 #
fosterfriends ◴[] No.44010123[source]
++ Kind of my whole thesis with Graphite. As more code gets AI-generated, the weight shifts to review, testing, and integration. Even as someone helping build AI code reviewers, we'll _need_ humans stamping forever - for many reasons, but fundamentally for accountability. A computer can never be held accountable

https://constelisvoss.com/pages/a-computer-can-never-be-held...

replies(2): >>44010360 #>>44036211 #
1. nadis ◴[] No.44036211[source]
> A computer can never be held accountable

I feel like I've been thinking along similar lines recently (due to re-read this though!) but instead of "computer" am replacing it with "AI" or "Agents" these days. Same point holds true.