←back to thread

721 points bradgessler | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.47s | source
Show context
abathologist ◴[] No.44010933[source]
I think we are going to be seeing a vast partitioning in society in the next months and years.

The process of forming expressions just is the process of conceptual and rational articulation (as per Brandom). Those who misunderstand this -- believing that concepts are ready made, then encoded and decoded from permutations of tokens, or, worse, who have no room to think of reasoning or conceptualization at all -- they will be automated away.

I don't mean that their jobs will be automated: I mean that they will cede sapience and resign to becoming robotic. A robot is just a "person whose work or activities are entirely mechanical" (https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=robot).

I'm afraid far too many are captive to the ideology of productionism (which is just a corollary of consumerism). Creative activity is not about content production. The aim of our creation is communication and mutual-transformation. Generation of digital artifacts may be useful for these purposes, but most uses seem to assume content production is the point, and that is a dark, sad, dead end.

replies(7): >>44011338 #>>44011643 #>>44012297 #>>44012674 #>>44012689 #>>44017606 #>>44025036 #
1. zaphirplane ◴[] No.44025036[source]
There are a lot simpler ways of expressing what you are trying to say. I played a bit taking the text feeding it to LLM to simplify then converting the simple version into a more dense complex wording.

What’s the point of my post you ask ? I like stories - Homer Simpson

replies(1): >>44042460 #
2. abathologist ◴[] No.44042460[source]
How do you know that generated text is actually a compression of what the author is trying to say?