←back to thread

747 points domenicd | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
aaldrick ◴[] No.44022472[source]
I see a lot of discussion about SRS, and I think most can agree they have improved.

What I would like to see covered is a more vague area, but almost more important:

It’s the space in between reading/understanding something and the SRS. There are almost no standalone tools dedicated to creating flashcards easily from existing programs (web browser, PDF readers etc.) into popular SRS (Anki, Mochi etc.). They should work almost as OS additions to make everything feel native and frictionless; I don’t need another standalone tool that does X Y and Z, I just need some sort of pipe into an SRS that is Mac friendly and does the job whilst not being in the way.

If someone knows of such a tool, I would love to hear about it.

replies(18): >>44022481 #>>44022516 #>>44022739 #>>44022956 #>>44023039 #>>44023159 #>>44023189 #>>44023292 #>>44023410 #>>44023414 #>>44023548 #>>44023614 #>>44023840 #>>44024127 #>>44024938 #>>44024962 #>>44025027 #>>44025781 #
kqr ◴[] No.44023292[source]
> There are almost no standalone tools dedicated to creating flashcards easily from existing programs

I think this is a common misunderstanding. Half the benefit of SRS comes from working out what the flashcards are. You have to circle around a concept, look for similarities, differences, examples, generalisations, properties, etc.

Is it hard work? Yes. Does it help understanding? Massively.

This is also a very difficult skill which, I believe, is why many people fail to appreciate SRS. They try, write bad flashcards, don't see results, and give up.

EDIT: This also leads to another common misunderstanding, that SRS is only good for memorising facts. With proper elaboration (thanks child comment), it can be used to build understanding of complex subjects too.

replies(8): >>44023326 #>>44023466 #>>44023623 #>>44023905 #>>44024137 #>>44024379 #>>44025195 #>>44026007 #
paulluuk ◴[] No.44023905[source]
> They try, write bad flashcards, don't see results, and give up.

But if that's the case, then wouldn't a program that takes a long text (like a book) and creates GOOD flashcards, be way superior over someone making their own bad flashcards?

replies(5): >>44023976 #>>44023982 #>>44024030 #>>44024185 #>>44024666 #
1. tdeck ◴[] No.44023976[source]
The quality of a card isn't absolute, it's personalized to the learner. There are ways to make an almost universally bad card (e.g. putting way too much information or a misleading image), but a really "good" card comes from the learner engaging with the material first before making the card.

The program doesn't know what's in the learner's head and what associations the learner will make. That's the benefit of making your own card.