←back to thread

655 points domenicd | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
aaldrick ◴[] No.44022472[source]
I see a lot of discussion about SRS, and I think most can agree they have improved.

What I would like to see covered is a more vague area, but almost more important:

It’s the space in between reading/understanding something and the SRS. There are almost no standalone tools dedicated to creating flashcards easily from existing programs (web browser, PDF readers etc.) into popular SRS (Anki, Mochi etc.). They should work almost as OS additions to make everything feel native and frictionless; I don’t need another standalone tool that does X Y and Z, I just need some sort of pipe into an SRS that is Mac friendly and does the job whilst not being in the way.

If someone knows of such a tool, I would love to hear about it.

replies(17): >>44022481 #>>44022516 #>>44022739 #>>44022956 #>>44023039 #>>44023159 #>>44023189 #>>44023292 #>>44023410 #>>44023414 #>>44023548 #>>44023614 #>>44023840 #>>44024127 #>>44024938 #>>44024962 #>>44025027 #
allenu ◴[] No.44022516[source]
I've written my own flashcards app (Fresh Cards) and once in a while, users ask if there's a way to import flashcards from things like web pages and PDF files, but to be honest, I still don't know how it would work, so maybe you can help me.

From a user standpoint, would it be an interactive process where you highlight things and then click a button to say "turn this into a flashcard", or would it be an automated tool that would scan the content and come up with a list of questions and answers t hat would test the material for you? What criteria would be used to determine what's worth turning into a question and answer? And how granular should the question be? I've seen demos of things that pick out specific facts, like dates or names, from the text to turn into questions, but that might not be that useful to quiz for some material. It seems like a very open-ended process to me, so it would be hard to get right for everyone's needs.

replies(2): >>44022833 #>>44023204 #
aaldrick ◴[] No.44022833[source]
I've tried Fresh Cards so thank you for developing that app, and trying to add cool new software into the space.

Great question. Here's one way to do it:

The first is how clunky the process of going from X to flashcard feels to the end user. One way to deal with the fact that we are crossing software border is to add an extra step where highlighting something allows you to go into an "inbox" before any cards are made. It is clear what the user has to do. They read something interesting, and add it to the inbox. When they are ready, they can head over and only then use some sort of automation (either via custom prompt for an AI or otherwise) to make the cards. This gives them another step, or interface, at which they can decide whether or not the thing they highlighted (since highlighting is easy) is actually worth something. It segments the process into clear easy sections: highlighting, deciding which highlights to flashcardify (and therefore keep), and flashcard review.

It definitely is an open-ended process, and I appreciate that apps need to have a strong opinion on how to direct users from start to finish; but I feel this is definitely possible now with cheap and quick AI.

I didn't answer every question but hopefully that helps somewhat.

replies(2): >>44022905 #>>44023247 #
1. allenu ◴[] No.44022905{3}[source]
I appreciate the detailed answer. That's a really good point about the software boundary and how that adds friction to just creating cards in the first place.

I like the idea of an inbox where you just toss things you think are worth remembering and maybe having a browser plugin or OS shortcut to save highlighted bits of info, but not necessarily creating a flashcard immediately from it. There's definitely some concrete things I can prototype here to try to make that workflow easier. And I can see how taking those tidbits of info and passing them to AI to create flashcards is doable too.

replies(1): >>44023474 #
2. aaldrick ◴[] No.44023474[source]
No problem - I'm happy to help. I spend way too much time thinking about this type of stuff.

I'm glad this has resonated, good luck with the prototypes. Let me know if you ever want more feedback.