Most active commenters
  • rcarmo(4)

←back to thread

728 points mikenew | 13 comments | | HN request time: 0.849s | source | bottom
Show context
johnh-hn ◴[] No.44017532[source]
Does anyone know if these glasses, or any other glasses, can be tried in-person and used on desktop? I'm legally blind, but have just enough vision to use a screen without a screen reader. The problem is I have to be about 6 inches from a 27 inch screen. I'm tall, and I'm almost bent in half to do it. It's been hell on my back and neck. I've only really made it work because I've modified so many things to get around it (i.e. customising Windows, Firefox, and so on).

The part that makes it so tough is monitor arms come in standard sizes and are nowhere near long enough or extend far enough for me to sit comfortably. My dad modified my desk for me years ago to mount a monitor arm on wooden blocks, but it means I can't move the monitor much.

Being able to wear glasses and ditch the monitor entirely would be a game changer for me. I know next to nothing about AR though, being as I assumed, perhaps wrongly, it isn't something that would work for me.

Edit: Thank you for the replies. It means a lot. I've got some options to explore here now thanks to you.

replies(17): >>44017553 #>>44017557 #>>44017567 #>>44017595 #>>44017671 #>>44017705 #>>44017711 #>>44017852 #>>44017879 #>>44018114 #>>44018148 #>>44018239 #>>44019336 #>>44019672 #>>44019978 #>>44020288 #>>44020319 #
1. rcarmo ◴[] No.44017711[source]
I have very high myopia (over -10) and share your concerns. I really wish these things were designed to cater to people for whom alternate display tech would actually simplify our lives.

So far I haven't seen anything that can deal with more than -8, and getting a custom prescription is usually prohibitively expensive. I can wear contacts to offset things somewhat, but they just cause added eyestrain.

replies(5): >>44017811 #>>44017874 #>>44018040 #>>44018611 #>>44019862 #
2. johnh-hn ◴[] No.44017811[source]
I know what you mean. I can't help but wonder what it would take to make a pair of these. The hardware requirements for low-vision users would be lower, as we wouldn't need things like ultra high definition displays.
replies(1): >>44017833 #
3. Philpax ◴[] No.44017833[source]
It's not too difficult to actually assemble - you just need some displays, a display driver, and the optics - but getting optics fabricated to meet your requirements might be challenging.
replies(1): >>44017977 #
4. swsieber ◴[] No.44017874[source]
I think custom prescriptions for the xreal air 1 are around $80: https://vroptician.com/prescription-lens-inserts/nreal-air

Which I could see that being a deal breaker, but maybe it's lower than you thought

replies(1): >>44017942 #
5. rcarmo ◴[] No.44017942[source]
With import tax to the EU, yeah, it's a deal breaker. Even from the UK. Also, that site only has lenses for the first gen, and above -10 there's a surcharge of EUR 70.

I pay more for eyeglasses than for a Quest 3, so... I don't want to double that.

replies(1): >>44019596 #
6. rcarmo ◴[] No.44017977{3}[source]
It is too difficult to assemble precisely for that reason.
replies(1): >>44018002 #
7. Philpax ◴[] No.44018002{4}[source]
The assembly is easy: the part sourcing less so ;-)
8. bluedino ◴[] No.44018040[source]
I had soemthing like -9.50, but had LASIK, and now I can't focus on anything less than eight or so inches away. I have never tried AR glasses or a VR headset, would they work?
replies(1): >>44018619 #
9. ycui1986 ◴[] No.44018611[source]
Virtue One's prescription insert is $100.
10. ycui1986 ◴[] No.44018619[source]
They should work, because they are at infinity in your eyes' perspective.
11. toyg ◴[] No.44019596{3}[source]
There is no import tax for the UK. I paid £60 in total for my lenses from official partner HONSVR. There are cheaper options on AliExpress.
replies(1): >>44019938 #
12. numpad0 ◴[] No.44019862[source]
Disclaimer: the following is bad medical advice, do not follow.

VR/AR/MR headsets aren't precisely focused at infinity, it's usually 10ft or so. They also have lower resolution than human eyes(~60 px/deg or 1MOA) while at it. This combined means you don't need full correction, I personally use -3 for both eyes, and it seem to work for me in VR.

YMMV.

13. rcarmo ◴[] No.44019938{4}[source]
No, but there is from the UK to the EU, thanks to Brexit.