←back to thread

Getting AI to write good SQL

(cloud.google.com)
477 points richards | 1 comments | 16 May 25 21:10 UTC | HN request time: 0.251s | source
Show context
wewewedxfgdf ◴[16 May 25 23:38 UTC] No.44010757[source]▶
Can I just say that Google AI Studio with latest Gemini is stunningly, amazingly, game changingly impressive.

It leaves Claude and ChatGPT's coding looking like they are from a different century. It's hard to believe these changes are coming in factors of weeks and months. Last month i could not believe how good Claude is. Today I'm not sure how I could continue programming without Google Gemini in my toolkit.

Gemini AI Studio is such a giant leap ahead in programming I have to pinch myself when I'm using it.

replies(26): >>44010808 #>>44010923 #>>44011434 #>>44011854 #>>44011858 #>>44011954 #>>44012172 #>>44012250 #>>44012251 #>>44012503 #>>44012606 #>>44012629 #>>44013306 #>>44013367 #>>44013381 #>>44013473 #>>44013576 #>>44013719 #>>44013871 #>>44013899 #>>44014263 #>>44014585 #>>44014770 #>>44014917 #>>44014928 #>>44018375 #
noosphr ◴[17 May 25 01:49 UTC] No.44011434[source]▶
It always is for the first week. Then you find out that the last 10% matter a lot more than than the other 90%. And finally they turn off the high compute version and you're left with a brain dead model that loses to a 32b local model half the time.
replies(1): >>44015307 #
1. Barbing ◴[17 May 25 16:17 UTC] No.44015307[source]▶
If a user eventually creates half a dozen projects with an API key for each, and prompts Gemini side-by-side under each key, and only some of the responses are consistently terrible…

Would you expect that to be Google employing cost-saving measures?