←back to thread

Getting AI to write good SQL

(cloud.google.com)
477 points richards | 2 comments | 16 May 25 21:10 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
wewewedxfgdf ◴[16 May 25 23:38 UTC] No.44010757[source]▶
Can I just say that Google AI Studio with latest Gemini is stunningly, amazingly, game changingly impressive.

It leaves Claude and ChatGPT's coding looking like they are from a different century. It's hard to believe these changes are coming in factors of weeks and months. Last month i could not believe how good Claude is. Today I'm not sure how I could continue programming without Google Gemini in my toolkit.

Gemini AI Studio is such a giant leap ahead in programming I have to pinch myself when I'm using it.

replies(26): >>44010808 #>>44010923 #>>44011434 #>>44011854 #>>44011858 #>>44011954 #>>44012172 #>>44012250 #>>44012251 #>>44012503 #>>44012606 #>>44012629 #>>44013306 #>>44013367 #>>44013381 #>>44013473 #>>44013576 #>>44013719 #>>44013871 #>>44013899 #>>44014263 #>>44014585 #>>44014770 #>>44014917 #>>44014928 #>>44018375 #
CuriouslyC ◴[17 May 25 00:08 UTC] No.44010923[source]▶
I'm really surprised more people haven't caught on. Claude can one shot small stuff of similar complexity, but as soon as you start to really push the model into longer, more involved use cases Gemini pulls way ahead. The context handling is so impressive, in addition to using it for coding agents, I use Gemini as a beta reader for a fairly long manuscript (~85k words) and it absolutely nails it, providing a high level report that's comparable to what a solid human beta reader would provide in seconds.
replies(3): >>44010944 #>>44011563 #>>44013373 #
koakuma-chan ◴[17 May 25 02:21 UTC] No.44011563[source]▶
And Gemini is free.
replies(3): >>44011998 #>>44012498 #>>44012727 #
scuol ◴[17 May 25 04:14 UTC] No.44011998[source]▶
Well, as with many of Google's services, you pay with your data.

Pay-as-you-go with Gemini does not snort your data for their own purposes (allegedly...).

replies(2): >>44012270 #>>44014975 #
1. Workaccount2 ◴[17 May 25 15:23 UTC] No.44014975{3}[source]▶
The cost to google lying about data privacy far exceeds the profit gained from using it. Alienate your most valuable customers (enterprise) so you can get 10% more training data? And almost certainly end up in a sea of lawsuits from them?

Not happening. Investors would riot.

replies(1): >>44015451 #
2. ayrtondesozzla ◴[17 May 25 16:37 UTC] No.44015451[source]▶
Indeed, the first stage of the enshittification process requires mollycoddling the customer in a convincing manner.

Looking forward to stage 2 - start serving the advertisers while placating the users, and finally stage 3 - offering it all up to the investors while playing the advertisers off each other and continuing to placate the users.