←back to thread

386 points carabiner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.25s | source
Show context
FilosofumRex ◴[] No.44011514[source]
MIT is hiding its own culpability by throwing the Student under the proverbial bus. Acemoglu and Autor who are notorious attention seekers and very media savvy and wealthy profs had vouched for him. There is no way a 2nd year PhD students could have pulled this off on his own without a trace of his whereabouts and contacts in the industry.

A cursory review of the first paragraph of the abstract of his single author paper should've set off alarms:

"AI-assisted researchers discover 44% more materials, resulting in a 39% increase in patent filings and a 17% rise in downstream product innovation".

Anyone with rudimentary familiarity with industrial materials science research would have suspected those double digit numbers - even single digit improvements are extremely rare.

replies(3): >>44011614 #>>44012232 #>>44019511 #
mizzao ◴[] No.44011614[source]
This is a recording of a seminar on this paper the author gave via zoom:

https://cassyni.com/events/MiPYGu3qzKP5MQFWNUn9Tb

In retrospect, there seems to be a tell that when he's lying he won't look at the screen/camera: his eyes go up, left, right, anywhere but forward. What I find scary is that this practice of extemporaneous fabrication may be a well-ingrained habit at this point that isn't limited to the scientific realm of the author's life.

replies(3): >>44013521 #>>44014960 #>>44021642 #
1. Loughla ◴[] No.44014960[source]
That's not really science though. Body language in general, and eye placement specifically is my most hated pseudoscience.

I struggle to make and maintain eye contact, because bad childhood trauma. Eye contact was perceived as aggression and disrespect by the man who lived in my house, and would lead to beatings. There are a lot of us that struggle with that, for many different reasons.