←back to thread

Getting AI to write good SQL

(cloud.google.com)
478 points richards | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.197s | source
Show context
mykowebhn ◴[] No.44013449[source]
I understand from a technical POV how this could be considered great news.

But I don't see how this is good news at all from a societal POV.

The last 15 or so years has seen an unprecedented rise in salaries for engineers, especially software engineers. This has brought an interest in the profession from people who would normally not have considered SW as a profession. I think this is both good and bad. It has brought new found wealth to more people, but it may have also diluted the quality of the talent pool. That said, I think it was mostly good.

Now with this game-changing efficiency from these AI tools, I'm sure we've seen an end to the glory days in terms of salaries for the SW profession.

With this gone, where else could relatively normal people achieve financial independence? Definitely not in the service industry.

Very sad.

replies(9): >>44013459 #>>44013488 #>>44013509 #>>44013550 #>>44013653 #>>44014967 #>>44015156 #>>44015674 #>>44015983 #
zkry ◴[] No.44013509[source]
Im curious why there's this sentiment in regarding advances in AI. High level programming languages didnt in the least bit take away the value of the SW profession, despite allowing a vast number more people to write software.

The amount and complexity of software will expand to its very outer bounds for which specialists will be required.

replies(1): >>44013831 #
1. AbstractH24 ◴[] No.44013831[source]
A better comparison I think is low-code platforms.

There are plenty of folks making a living using platforms like Salesforce and “clicks not code,” but it never led to an implosion of the SE job market. Just expanded the tech job pool. And it’s hard to imagine how that would have happened if everything needed to be coded.

Like how a growth in medical-paraprofessionals didn’t negate the need for doctors and nurses.