←back to thread

MIT asks arXiv to withdraw preprint of paper on AI and scientific discovery

(economics.mit.edu)
386 points carabiner | 1 comments | 16 May 25 15:09 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
coderintherye ◴[16 May 25 19:32 UTC] No.44009020[source]▶
Nice Twitter thread from Nov '24 analyzing the paper: https://x.com/Robert_Palgrave/status/1856273405965693430
replies(3): >>44009244 #>>44009357 #>>44013847 #
andy99 ◴[16 May 25 19:57 UTC] No.44009244[source]▶
Is there a way for not Twitter users to read these?
replies(2): >>44009297 #>>44009330 #
madars ◴[16 May 25 20:02 UTC] No.44009297[source]▶
Yeah, replace x.com with xcancel.com or nitter.poast.org, e.g., https://xcancel.com/Robert_Palgrave/status/18562734059656934...
replies(1): >>44010643 #
genewitch ◴[16 May 25 23:14 UTC] No.44010643[source]▶
While poast works, I strongly feel most people on this site are not aligned with what poast represents. Graf has to spend a lot of time (and time = money) getting accounts set up to run nitter, and it would suck if the views of poast users wound up costing the internet a twitter mirror.

I strongly recommend people not investigate this unless they think 4chan is quaint. As in, if the reason you are not using X is because of the outrage at Elon and the "typical user" of X, then maybe use xcancel instead.

replies(2): >>44011330 #>>44013340 #
1. BlueTemplar ◴[17 May 25 10:37 UTC] No.44013340{3}[source]▶
4chan is probably still 'better' than Xitter : not only it's open web, it's also not taken 'seriously'.

Twitter's issues long predate Musk : for instance Mastodon was created as a reaction to the 2012 APIpocalypse.