←back to thread

Thoughts on thinking

(dcurt.is)
645 points bradgessler | 2 comments | 16 May 25 19:09 UTC | HN request time: 0.402s | source
Show context
taylorallred ◴[16 May 25 19:32 UTC] No.44009019[source]▶
Among the many ways that AI causes me existential angst, you've reminded me of another one. That is, the fact that AI pushes you towards the most average thoughts. It makes sense, given the technology. This scares me because creative thought happens at the very edge. When you get stuck on a problem, like you mentioned, you're on the cusp of something novel that will at the very least grow you as a person. The temptation to use AI could rob you of the novelty in favor what has already been done.
replies(5): >>44010409 #>>44010415 #>>44010693 #>>44013960 #>>44015934 #
MoonGhost ◴[16 May 25 23:25 UTC] No.44010693[source]▶
> AI pushes you towards

That's interesting point. But here is the thing: you are supposed to drive. Not AI god. Look at it as at an assistant whom you can interrupt, instruct, correct, ask to redo. While focusing on 'what' you can delegate it some 'how' problems.

replies(2): >>44011447 #>>44014068 #
abakker ◴[17 May 25 01:50 UTC] No.44011447[source]▶
I for one, thing directing subordinates to do something I could be doing kinda … sucks? Like, I get that’s how you have to work with LLMs, but it isn’t a fun thing to do for me.
replies(2): >>44012703 #>>44014078 #
1. Cipater ◴[17 May 25 07:39 UTC] No.44012703[source]▶
Do you do every single thing that you are capable of doing yourself?
replies(1): >>44013695 #
2. BlarfMcFlarf ◴[17 May 25 12:08 UTC] No.44013695[source]▶
Non hierarchical collaboration is the option you are excluding. Where you accept pushback and feedback because you know it comes with creative vision and perspective you lack. You can do creative things with other creative people.