←back to thread

Getting AI to write good SQL

(cloud.google.com)
477 points richards | 7 comments | | HN request time: 0.682s | source | bottom
1. danjc ◴[] No.44012457[source]
The article comments "out of the box, LLMs are particularly good at tasks like creative writing" but I think this actually demonstrates the problem with the ai.

A writer won't think that they're good at creative writing. In fact, I'm pretty sure they'd think LLM's are terrible at creative writing.

In other words, to an expert in their field, they're not that good - at least not yet.

But to someone who is not an expert, they're unbelievably good - they're enabled to do something they had zero ability to do before.

replies(1): >>44012798 #
2. randomNumber7 ◴[] No.44012798[source]
Yes, but why is then everyone on HN claiming LLMs can code on expert level?
replies(4): >>44013127 #>>44013180 #>>44014291 #>>44014361 #
3. danjc ◴[] No.44013127[source]
Fast for hammering out boilerplate, great for understanding something you've never done before. Much less value for field-frontier or novel work.
4. __loam ◴[] No.44013180[source]
I would posit that most people on hackernews are actually not that experienced.
5. candiddevmike ◴[] No.44014291[source]
Techbro astroturfing. You don't really see the same level of OMG AI on other forums like Reddit. Same thing happened with cryptocurrencies, HN was inundated with plugs for them and the same behavior was downvoted severely elsewhere.
6. jeltz ◴[] No.44014361[source]
Because the people claiming so are actually bad at coding. I suspect a lot of them actually work in non-coding positions. And while I can for sure see how LLMs can be useful, they code at the level of a junior dev fresh out of college, if I am being generous.
replies(1): >>44015102 #
7. Workaccount2 ◴[] No.44015102{3}[source]
Most of the software I use feels like it is coded by a junior dev fresh out of college anyway. Slow, buggy, bloated, gobbles memory...