←back to thread

MIT asks arXiv to withdraw preprint of paper on AI and scientific discovery

(economics.mit.edu)
296 points carabiner | 1 comments | 16 May 25 15:09 UTC | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
coderintherye ◴[16 May 25 19:32 UTC] No.44009020[source]▶
Nice Twitter thread from Nov '24 analyzing the paper: https://x.com/Robert_Palgrave/status/1856273405965693430
replies(2): >>44009244 #>>44009357 #
andy99 ◴[16 May 25 19:57 UTC] No.44009244[source]▶
Is there a way for not Twitter users to read these?
replies(2): >>44009297 #>>44009330 #
madars ◴[16 May 25 20:02 UTC] No.44009297[source]▶
Yeah, replace x.com with xcancel.com or nitter.poast.org, e.g., https://xcancel.com/Robert_Palgrave/status/18562734059656934...
replies(1): >>44010643 #
genewitch ◴[16 May 25 23:14 UTC] No.44010643[source]▶
While poast works, I strongly feel most people on this site are not aligned with what poast represents. Graf has to spend a lot of time (and time = money) getting accounts set up to run nitter, and it would suck if the views of poast users wound up costing the internet a twitter mirror.

I strongly recommend people not investigate this unless they think 4chan is quaint. As in, if the reason you are not using X is because of the outrage at Elon and the "typical user" of X, then maybe use xcancel instead.

replies(1): >>44011330 #
kurisufag ◴[17 May 25 01:26 UTC] No.44011330[source]▶
fwiw i believe strongly that there would not still be a nitter without graf's work on it.

in the space of working on cool shit, he's good people. see: moldbug and urbit, for a similar case.

replies(1): >>44012163 #
1. genewitch ◴[17 May 25 05:06 UTC] No.44012163[source]▶
oh, totally. I was hoping to avoid people going "i wonder what poast is", but Graf said they've been backlinked before and it's no big deal; but i can't remove my earlier comment.

So i guess i misread!