←back to thread

281 points carabiner | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
elcritch ◴[] No.44010190[source]
In my opinion the paper shouldn’t be take down. Instead a note should be added noting the concerns with the pre-print and that’s it’s likely fraudulent.

Edit: Since the paper has been cited, others may still need to reference the paper to determine if it materially affects a paper citing it. If the paper is removed it’s just a void.

replies(4): >>44010437 #>>44010665 #>>44010722 #>>44011297 #
1. azinman2 ◴[] No.44010665[source]
unless arXiv has a "there used to be a paper here, but it was retracted" page